Cohomologies, deformations and extensions of pre-LieDer pairs

  • Shanshan Liu

    Shenzhen Technology University, P. R. China
  • Liangyun Chen

    Northeast Normal University, Changchun, P. R. China
Cohomologies, deformations and extensions of pre-LieDer pairs cover
Download PDF

This article is published open access under our Subscribe to Open model.

Abstract

In this paper, we use the higher derived bracket to give the controlling algebra of pre-LieDer pairs. We give the cohomology of pre-LieDer pairs by using the twist L∞‑algebra of this controlling algebra. In particular, we define the cohomology of regular pre-LieDer pairs. We study infinitesimal deformations of pre-LieDer pairs, which are characterized by the second cohomology group of pre-LieDer pairs. We also define the cohomology of regular pre-LieDer pairs with coefficients in an arbitrary representation and using the second cohomology group to classify abelian extensions of regular pre-LieDer pairs.

1. Introduction

Derivations play an important role in the study of various algebraic structures. They can be used to construct higher derived brackets and homotopy Lie algebras [36
T. T. Voronov, Higher derived brackets for arbitrary derivations. In Travaux mathématiques. Fasc. XVI, pp. 163–186, Trav. Math. 16, Univ. Luxemb., Luxembourg, 2005 Zbl 1136.17014 MR 2223157
], deformation formulas [10
V. Coll, M. Gerstenhaber, and A. Giaquinto, An explicit deformation formula with non-commuting derivations. In Ring theory 1989 (Ramat Gan and Jerusalem, 1988/1989), pp. 396–403, Israel Math. Conf. Proc. 1, Weizmann, Jerusalem, 1989 Zbl 0684.16016 MR 1029329
] and differential Galois theory [30
A. R. Magid, Lectures on differential Galois theory. Univ. Lecture Ser. 7, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1994, 105 pp. Zbl 0855.12001 MR 1301076
]. They are also important in control theory [1
V. Ayala, E. Kizil, and I. De Azevedo Tribuzy, On an algorithm for finding derivations of Lie algebras. Proyecciones 31 (2012), no. 1, 81–90 Zbl 1272.17021 MR 2924691
, 2
V. Ayala and J. Tirao, Linear control systems on Lie groups and controllability. In G. Ferreyra, R. Gardner, H. Hermes, and H. Sussmann (eds.), Differential geometry and control, pp. 47–64, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 64, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999 Zbl 0916.93015 MR 1654529
] and functional analysis [6
A. F. Ber, V. I. Chilin, and F. A. Sukochev, Continuous derivations on algebras of locally measurable operators are inner. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 109 (2014), no. 1, 65–89 Zbl 1304.46064 MR 3237736
, 7
A. F. Ber, B. de Pagter, and F. A. Sukochev, Derivations in algebras of operator-valued functions. J. Operator Theory 66 (2011), no. 2, 261–300 Zbl 1247.47011 MR 2844466
]. Moreover, they also play a fundamental role in the study of gauge theories in quantum field theory via the BV formalism [5
I. A. Batalin and G. A. Vilkovisky, Gauge algebra and quantization. Phys. Lett. B 102 (1981), no. 1, 27–31 MR 0616572
]. In [16
M. Doubek and T. Lada, Homotopy derivations. J. Homotopy Relat. Struct. 11 (2016), no. 3, 599–630 Zbl 1360.18015 MR 3542099
, 29
J.-L. Loday, On the operad of associative algebras with derivation. Georgian Math. J. 17 (2010), no. 2, 347–372 Zbl 1237.18007 MR 2676956
], the authors studied the operad of associative algebras with derivation. Recently, in [33
R. Tang, Y. Frégier, and Y. Sheng, Cohomologies of a Lie algebra with a derivation and applications. J. Algebra 534 (2019), 65–99 Zbl 1455.17020 MR 3979066
], the authors studied the cohomology, extensions and deformations of Lie algebras with derivations. Using similar ideas, the author studied associative algebras with derivations [13
A. Das and A. Mandal, Extension, deformation and categorification of AssDer pairs. Theory Appl. Categ. 45 (2026), no. 1, 1–32 Zbl 08156150 MR 5018204
] and Leibniz algebras with derivations [12
A. Das, Leibniz algebras with derivations. J. Homotopy Relat. Struct. 16 (2021), no. 2, 245–274 Zbl 1477.17018 MR 4266206
].
The notion of a pre-Lie algebra (Its other names are left-symmetric algebras, quasi-associative algebras, Vinberg algebras and so on) has been introduced independently by M. Gerstenhaber in the deformation theory of rings and algebras [19
M. Gerstenhaber, The cohomology structure of an associative ring. Ann. of Math. (2) 78 (1963), no. 2, 267–288 Zbl 0131.27302 MR 0161898
]. Pre-Lie algebra arose from the study of affine manifolds and affine structures on Lie groups [24
J.-L. Koszul, Domaines bornés homogènes et orbites de groupes de transformations affines. Bull. Soc. Math. France 89 (1961), 515–533 Zbl 0144.34002 MR 0145559
] and homogeneous convex cones [34
È. B. Vinberg, The theory of homogeneous convex cones (in Russian). Tr. Moskov. Mat. Obšč. 12 (1963), 303–358. English translation. Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 12 (1963), 340–403 Zbl 0138.43301 MR 0158414
]. Its defining identity is weaker than associativity. This algebraic structure describes some properties of cochains space in Hochschild cohomology of an associative algebra, rooted trees and vector fields on affine spaces. Moreover, it is playing an increasing role in algebra, geometry and physics due to their applications in nonassociative algebras, combinatorics, numerical analysis and quantum field theory; see also in [3
C. Bai, Left-symmetric bialgebras and an analogue of the classical Yang–Baxter equation. Commun. Contemp. Math. 10 (2008), no. 2, 221–260 Zbl 1173.17025 MR 2409367
, 4
C. Bai, An introduction to pre-Lie algebras. In Algebra and applications 1: non-associative algebras and categories, pp. 245–273, ISTE, London, 2020 Zbl 1496.17023 MR 4484613
, 8
D. Burde, Left-symmetric algebras, or pre-Lie algebras in geometry and physics. Cent. Eur. J. Math. 4 (2006), no. 3, 323–357 Zbl 1151.17301 MR 2233854
, 11
A. Connes and D. Kreimer, Hopf algebras, renormalization and noncommutative geometry. Comm. Math. Phys. 199 (1998), no. 1, 203–242 Zbl 0932.16038 MR 1660199
]. There is a close relationship between pre-Lie algebras and Lie algebras: a pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,⋅) gives rise to a Lie algebra (𝔤,[⋅,⋅]C) via the commutator bracket, which is called the subadjacent Lie algebra and denoted by 𝔤C. Furthermore, the map L:𝔤→𝔤𝔩(𝔤), defined by Lxy=x⋅y for all x,y∈𝔤, gives rise to a representation of the subadjacent Lie algebra 𝔤C on 𝔤.
The purpose of the paper is to study the cohomology of a pre-LieDer pair and its applications. The motivation for such a study is due to the study of relative difference Lie algebras and relative Rota–Baxter Lie algebras [21
J. Jiang, Y. Li, and Y. Sheng, Cohomologies of difference Lie groups and the van Est theorem. J. Algebra 645 (2024), 116–142 Zbl 1533.13029 MR 4708529
–23
J. Jiang and Y. Sheng, Deformations, cohomologies and integrations of relative difference Lie algebras. J. Algebra 614 (2023), 535–563 Zbl 1519.17027 MR 4499354
, 27
A. Lazarev, Y. Sheng, and R. Tang, Deformations and homotopy theory of relative Rota–Baxter Lie algebras. Comm. Math. Phys. 383 (2021), no. 1, 595–631 Zbl 1476.17010 MR 4236074
]. We use the higher derived bracket to give the controlling algebra of pre-LieDer pairs. Using the Maurer–Cartan element of this controlling algebra, we construct a twist L∞‑algebra. We give the cohomology of pre-LieDer pairs by using this twist L∞‑algebra. Compared to Lie algebras, associative algebras and Leibniz algebras, this is a different way to constructing cohomologies with derivations. Using this cohomology, we study infinitesimal deformations of pre-LieDer pairs. We also define the cohomology of regular pre-LieDer pairs with coefficients in an arbitrary representation and study abelian extensions of regular pre-LieDer pairs.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, first, we give the notion of pre-LieDer pairs. Then, by a given representation (V;ρ,μ) of a pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,π), we recall the graded Lie algebra whose Maurer–Cartan elements are π+ρ+μ. Finally, we use this Maurer–Cartan element to give the cohomology of pre-Lie algebras with representations. In Section 3, first, we recall the notion of L∞‑algebras and higher derived brackets. Then, we use higher derived brackets to construct an L∞‑algebra. Given a pre-LieDer pair, we can obtain the Maurer–Cartan element of this L∞‑algebra. Finally, using this Maurer–Cartan element, we construct a twist L∞‑algebra, which controls deformations of pre-LieDer pairs. In Section 4, first, using the twist L∞‑algebra constructed from the last section, we give the cohomology of pre-LieDer pairs. Then, we study infinitesimal deformations of pre-LieDer pairs by using this cohomology. We show that equivalent infinitesimal deformations are in the same second cohomology group. Finally, we use this cohomology to give the cohomology of regular pre-LieDer pairs. In Section 5, first, we introduce the notion of representations of regular pre-LieDer pairs. Then, we give cohomologies of regular pre-LieDer pairs with coefficients in an arbitrary representation. Finally, we deal with abelian extensions of regular pre-LieDer pairs. We show that the second cohomology group classifies abelian extensions of regular pre-LieDer pairs.
In this paper, we work over an algebraically closed field 𝕂 of characteristic 0, and all the vector spaces are over 𝕂.
The following are cohomologies that appeared in this paper. We made a summary.
  1. (1)
    The cohomology of the cochain complex (⨁n=1+∞Cn(𝔤;V),d) is called the cohomology of the pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,⋅) with coefficients in the representation (V;ρ,μ).
  2. (2)
    The cohomology of the cochain complex (⨁n=1+∞Cn(𝔤,ρ,μ),∂) is called the cohomology of the pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,⋅) with the representation (V;ρ,μ).
  3. (3)
    The cohomology of the cochain complex (⨁n=1+∞Cn(𝔤,ρ,μ,D),𝒟) is called the cohomology of the pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D,ρ,μ).
  4. (4)
    The cohomology of the cochain complex (⨁n=1+∞Cn(𝔤,D),𝒟¯) is called the cohomology of the regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D).
  5. (5)
    The cohomology of the cochain complex (⨁n=1+∞Cn(𝔤,D;V,K,ρ~,μ~),𝒟(ρ~,μ~)) is called the cohomology of the regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D) with coefficients in the representation (V,K,ρ~,μ~).

2. Cohomologies of pre-Lie algebras with representations

In this section, first, we define a pre-LieDer pair, which consists of a pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,π) and a derivation D. Then, we recall the graded Lie algebra whose Maurer–Cartan element is π+ρ+μ, where (V;ρ,μ) is a representation of the pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,π). Finally, we use this Maurer–Cartan element to give the cohomology of the pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,π) with the representation (V;ρ,μ).

Definition 2.1

([8
D. Burde, Left-symmetric algebras, or pre-Lie algebras in geometry and physics. Cent. Eur. J. Math. 4 (2006), no. 3, 323–357 Zbl 1151.17301 MR 2233854
]). A pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,⋅) is a vector space 𝔤 equipped with a bilinear product ⋅:𝔤⊗𝔤→𝔤 such that for all x,y,z∈𝔤, the following equality is satisfied:
(x⋅y)⋅z−x⋅(y⋅z)=(y⋅x)⋅z−y⋅(x⋅z).
Let (𝔤,⋅) be a pre-Lie algebra. The commutator [x,y]C=x⋅y−y⋅x gives a Lie algebra (𝔤,[⋅,⋅]C), which is denoted by 𝔤C and called the sub-adjacent Lie algebra of (𝔤,⋅).

Definition 2.2

([3
C. Bai, Left-symmetric bialgebras and an analogue of the classical Yang–Baxter equation. Commun. Contemp. Math. 10 (2008), no. 2, 221–260 Zbl 1173.17025 MR 2409367
]). A representation of a pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,⋅) on a vector space V consists of a pair (ρ,μ), where ρ:𝔤→𝔤𝔩(V) is a representation of the sub-adjacent Lie algebra 𝔤C on V, and μ:𝔤→𝔤𝔩(V) is a linear map such that for all x,y∈𝔤:
μ(y)∘μ(x)−μ(x⋅y)=μ(y)∘ρ(x)−ρ(x)∘μ(y).
We denote a representation of a pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,⋅) by (V;ρ,μ). Furthermore, let L,R:𝔤→𝔤𝔩(𝔤) be linear maps, where Lxy=x⋅y,Rxy=y⋅x. Then (𝔤;L,R) is also a representation, which is called the regular representation.

Definition 2.3.

Let (V;ρ,μ) be a representation of a pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,⋅) and D:𝔤→V a linear map such that for all x,y∈𝔤,
D(x⋅y)=ρ(x)D(y)+μ(y)D(x).
Then D is a derivation of the pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,⋅) with respect to the representation (V;ρ,μ). A pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,⋅) with D is called a pre-LieDer pair, which is denoted by ((𝔤,⋅),D,ρ,μ). In particular, let (𝔤;L,R) be a regular representation, then ((𝔤,⋅),D,L,R) is called a regular pre-LieDer pair and simply denoted by ((𝔤,⋅),D).

Example 1.

Let {e1,e2,e3} be a basis of 3-dimensional vector space 𝔤. Define a product on 𝔤 by
e1⋅e1 =e1,  e1⋅e2 =e3,  e1⋅e3 =0, e2⋅e1 =0, e2⋅e2 =0, e2⋅e3 =0, e3⋅e1 =0, e3⋅e2 =0, e3⋅e3 =0.
Then (𝔤,⋅) is a pre-Lie algebra. Let D=( 000010011). More precisely, D(e1)=0,D(e2)=e2+e3,D(e3)=e3. Then ((𝔤,⋅),D) is a regular pre-LieDer pair.

Definition 2.4.

Let ((𝔤,⋅),D,ρ,μ) and ((𝔤′,⋅′),D′,ρ′,μ′) be two pre-LieDer pairs. A homomorphism (f𝔤,fV) from ((𝔤,⋅),D,ρ,μ) to ((𝔤′,⋅′),D′,ρ′,μ′) consists of a pre-Lie algebra homomorphism f𝔤:(𝔤,⋅)→(𝔤′,⋅′) and a linear map fV:V→V′ such that for all x∈𝔤,
fV∘ρ(x) =ρ′(f𝔤(x))∘fV, fV∘μ(x) =μ′(f𝔤(x))∘fV, fV∘D =D′∘f𝔤.
Let (V;ρ,μ) be a representation of a pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,⋅). The set of n-cochains is given by
Cn(𝔤;V)=Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,V) ∀n≥1.
For all f∈Cn(𝔤;V),x1,…,xn+1∈𝔤, define the coboundary operator d:Cn(𝔤;V)→Cn+1(𝔤;V) by
(df)(x1,…,xn+1)=∑i=1n(−1)i+1ρ(xi)f(x1,…,xi^,…,xn+1) (df)(x1,…,xn+1)=i+∑i=1n(−1)i+1μ(xn+1)f(x1,…,xi^,…,xn,xi) (df)(x1,…,xn+1)=i−∑i=1n(−1)i+1f(x1,…,xi^,…,xn,xi⋅xn+1) (df)(x1,…,xn+1)=i+∑1≤i<j≤n(−1)i+jf([xi,xj]C,x1,…,xi^,…,xj^,…,xn+1).

Theorem 2.5

([17
A. Dzhumadil’daev, Cohomologies and deformations of right-symmetric algebras. J. Math. Sci. 93 (1999), no. 6, 836–876 Zbl 0938.17002 MR 1698758
]). With the above notation, (⨁n=1+∞Cn(𝔤;V),d) is a chain complex.

Definition 2.6

([17
A. Dzhumadil’daev, Cohomologies and deformations of right-symmetric algebras. J. Math. Sci. 93 (1999), no. 6, 836–876 Zbl 0938.17002 MR 1698758
]). The cohomology of the cochain complex (⨁n=1+∞Cn(𝔤;V),d) is called the cohomology of the pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,⋅) with coefficients in the representation (V;ρ,μ). The corresponding cohomology group is denoted by Hn(𝔤;V).

Remark 2.7.

We use dreg to denote the coboundary operator of (𝔤,⋅) with the coefficients in the regular representation.
A permutation σ∈𝕊n is called an (i,n−i)-unshuffle if σ(1)<⋯<σ(i) and σ(i+1)<⋯<σ(n). If i=0 and i=n, we assume σ=Id. The set of all (i,n−i)-unshuffles will be denoted by 𝕊(i,n−i). The notion of an (i1,…,ik)-unshuffle and the set 𝕊(i1,…,ik) are defined similarly.
Let 𝔤 be a vector space. It was shown in [9
F. Chapoton and M. Livernet, Pre-Lie algebras and the rooted trees operad. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2001 (2001), no. 8, 395–408 Zbl 1053.17001 MR 1827084
, 31, 38
Q. Wang, Y. Sheng, C. Bai, and J. Liu, Nijenhuis operators on pre-Lie algebras. Commun. Contemp. Math. 21 (2019), no. 7, article no. 1850050, 37 pp. Zbl 1439.17023 MR 4017776
] that the graded vector space C∗(𝔤;𝔤)=⨁n=1+∞Cn(𝔤;𝔤)=⨁n=1+∞Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤) equipped with the Matsushima–Nijenhuis bracket
[P,Q]MN=P∘Q−(−1)pqQ∘P ∀P∈Cp+1(𝔤;𝔤),Q∈Cq+1(𝔤;𝔤)
is a graded Lie algebra, where P∘Q∈Cp+q+1(𝔤;𝔤) is defined by
P∘Q(x1,…,xp+q+1)   =∑σ∈𝕊(q,1,p−1)sgn(σ)P(Q(xσ(1),…,xσ(q),xσ(q+1)),   =∑σ∈𝕊(q,1,p−1)sgn(σ)P(xσ(q+2),…,xσ(p+q),xp+q+1)     +(−1)pq∑σ∈𝕊(p,q)sgn(σ)P(xσ(1),…,xσ(p),     +(−1)pq∑σ∈𝕊(p,q)sgn(σ)P(Q(xσ(p+1),…,xσ(p+q),xp+q+1)).
In particular, π∈Hom(𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤) defines a pre-Lie algebra if and only if [π,π]MN=0. If π is a pre-Lie algebra structure, then dπ:=[π,⋅]MN is a graded derivation of the graded Lie algebra (C∗(𝔤;𝔤),[⋅,⋅]MN) satisfying dπ∘dπ=0, so that (C∗(𝔤;𝔤),[⋅,⋅]MN,dπ) becomes a differential graded Lie algebra.
Let 𝔤1 and 𝔤2 be vector spaces, and let elements of 𝔤1 be denoted by x,y,xi and elements of 𝔤2 be denoted by u,v,vi. Let c:∧n−1𝔤1⊗𝔤1→𝔤2 be a linear map. We can construct a linear map c^∈Cn(𝔤1⊕𝔤2,𝔤1⊕𝔤2) by
c^(x1+v1,…,xn+vn):=c(x1,…,xn).
In general, for a given linear map f:∧k−1𝔤1⊗∧l𝔤2⊗𝔤1→𝔤j for j∈{1,2}, we define a linear map f^∈Ck+l(𝔤1⊕𝔤2,𝔤1⊕𝔤2) by
f^(x1+v1,…,xk+l+vk+l) f^(x=∑σ∈𝕊(k−1,l)sgn(σ)f(xσ(1),…,xσ(k−l),vσ(k),…,vσ(k+l−1),xk+l).
Similarly, for f:∧k𝔤1⊗∧l−1𝔤2⊗𝔤2→𝔤j for j∈{1,2}, we define a linear map f^∈Ck+l(𝔤1⊕𝔤2,𝔤1⊕𝔤2) by
f^(x1+v1,…,xk+l+vk+l) f^(x=∑σ∈𝕊(k,l−1)sgn(σ)f(xσ(1),…,xσ(k),vσ(k+1),…,vσ(k+l−1),vk+l).
We call the linear map f^ a horizontal lift of f or simply a lift. We define 𝒢k,l=∧k−1𝔤1⊗∧l𝔤2⊗𝔤1+∧k𝔤1⊗∧l−1𝔤2⊗𝔤2. The vector space ∧n−1(𝔤1⊕𝔤2)⊗(𝔤1⊕𝔤2) is isomorphic to the direct sum of 𝒢k,l,k+l=n.

Definition 2.8

([37
Q. Wang and J. Liu, Quasi-pre-Lie bialgebras and twisting of pre-Lie algebras. J. Algebra Appl. 23 (2024), no. 10, article no. 2450160, 33 pp. Zbl 07914997 MR 4783276
]). A linear map f∈Hom(∧n−1(𝔤1⊕𝔤2)⊗(𝔤1⊕𝔤2),𝔤1⊕𝔤2) has a bidegree k∣l if the following four conditions hold:
  1. (1)
    k+l+1=n.
  2. (2)
    If X is an element in 𝒢k+1,l, then f(X)∈𝔤1.
  3. (3)
    If X is an element in 𝒢k,l+1, then f(X)∈𝔤2.
  4. (4)
    All the other cases, f(X)=0.
We denote a linear map f with bidegree k∣l by ∥f∥=k∣l.
We call a linear map f homogeneous if f has a bidegree. We denote the set of homogeneous linear maps of bidegree k∣l by Ck∣l(𝔤1⊕𝔤2,𝔤1⊕𝔤2). We have k+l≥0,k,l≥−1 because n≥1 and k+1,l+1≥0.
In our later study, the subspaces Ck∣0(𝔤1⊕𝔤2,𝔤1⊕𝔤2) and Cl∣−1(𝔤1⊕𝔤2,𝔤1⊕𝔤2) will be frequently used. By the above lift, we have the following isomorphisms:
Ck∣0(𝔤1⊕𝔤2,𝔤1⊕𝔤2) ≅Hom(∧k𝔤1⊗𝔤1,𝔤1)⊕Hom(∧k𝔤1⊗𝔤2,𝔤2) ≅H⊕Hom(∧k−1𝔤1⊗𝔤2⊗𝔤1,𝔤2); Cl∣−1(𝔤1⊕𝔤2,𝔤1⊕𝔤2) ≅Hom(∧l−1𝔤1⊗𝔤1,𝔤2).

Lemma 2.9

([37
Q. Wang and J. Liu, Quasi-pre-Lie bialgebras and twisting of pre-Lie algebras. J. Algebra Appl. 23 (2024), no. 10, article no. 2450160, 33 pp. Zbl 07914997 MR 4783276
]). If ∥f∥=kf∣lf and ∥g∥=kg∣lg, then [f,g]MN has the bidegree kf+kg∣lf+lg.

Lemma 2.10

([37
Q. Wang and J. Liu, Quasi-pre-Lie bialgebras and twisting of pre-Lie algebras. J. Algebra Appl. 23 (2024), no. 10, article no. 2450160, 33 pp. Zbl 07914997 MR 4783276
]). If ∥f∥=−1∣k (resp. k∣−1) and ∥g∥=−1∣l (resp. l∣−1), then [f,g]MN=0.
By Lemmas 2.9 and 2.10, we obtain that (⨁k=0+∞Ck∣0(𝔤1⊕𝔤2,𝔤1⊕𝔤2),[⋅,⋅]MN) is a graded Lie sub-algebra of the graded Lie algebra (C∗(𝔤1⊕𝔤2,𝔤1⊕𝔤2),[⋅,⋅]MN) and (⨁l=0+∞Cl∣−1(𝔤1⊕𝔤2,𝔤1⊕𝔤2),[⋅,⋅]MN) is an abelian graded Lie sub-algebra of the graded Lie algebra (C∗(𝔤1⊕𝔤2,𝔤1⊕𝔤2),[⋅,⋅]MN).
For all π∈Hom(𝔤⊗𝔤,V), ρ∈Hom(𝔤⊗V,V) and μ∈Hom(V⊗𝔤,V), we have the following.

Proposition 2.11

([28
J. Liu and Q. Wang, Pre-Lie analogues of Poisson–Nijenhuis structures and Maurer–Cartan equations. J. Algebra Appl. 21 (2022), no. 6, article no. 2250120, 34 pp. Zbl 1517.17001 MR 4429005
]). Let 𝔤 and V be two vector spaces. Then π+ρ+μ∈C1∣0(𝔤⊕V,𝔤⊕V) is a Maurer–Cartan element of the graded Lie algebra (⨁k=0+∞Ck∣0(𝔤⊕V,𝔤⊕V),[⋅,⋅]MN) if and only if (V;ρ,μ) is a representation of the pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,π).
Let (V;ρ,μ) be a representation of a pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,π). By Proposition 2.11, π+ρ+μ is a Maurer–Cartan element of (⨁k=0+∞Ck∣0(𝔤⊕V,𝔤⊕V),[⋅,⋅]MN). It follows from the graded Jacobi identity that dπ+ρ+μ:=[π+ρ+μ,⋅]MN is a graded derivation of the graded Lie algebra (⨁k=0+∞Ck∣0(𝔤⊕V,𝔤⊕V),[⋅,⋅]MN) satisfying dπ+ρ+μ2=0. Thus, we have the following.

Theorem 2.12.

Let (𝔤,π) be a pre-Lie algebra and (V;ρ,μ) be a representation of (𝔤,π). Then (⨁k=0+∞Ck∣0(𝔤⊕V,𝔤⊕V),[⋅,⋅]MN,dπ+ρ+μ) is a differential graded Lie algebra.
Furthermore, (V;ρ+ρ′,μ+μ′) is a representation of the pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,π+π′) for π′∈Hom(𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤), ρ′∈Hom(𝔤⊗V,V) and μ′∈Hom(V⊗𝔤,𝔤) if and only if π′+ρ′+μ′ is a Maurer–Cartan element of the differential graded Lie algebra (⨁k=0+∞Ck∣0(𝔤⊕V,𝔤⊕V),[⋅,⋅]MN,dπ+ρ+μ).
Let (V;ρ,μ) be a representation of the pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,π). Define the set of 0-cochains C0(𝔤,ρ,μ) to be 0. For n≥1, we define the set of n-cochains Cn(𝔤,ρ,μ) by
Cn(𝔤,ρ,μ) :=Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤)⊕Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗V,V) :=H⊕Hom(∧n−2𝔤⊗V⊗𝔤,V).
Define the coboundary operator ∂:Cn(𝔤,ρ,μ)→Cn+1(𝔤,ρ,μ) by
∂f:=(−1)n−1dπ+ρ+μf=(−1)n−1[π+ρ+μ,f]MN.
Since dπ+ρ+μ2=0, we obtain that ∂2=0. Thus, (⨁n=0+∞Cn(𝔤,ρ,μ),∂) is a cochain complex.

Definition 2.13

([28
J. Liu and Q. Wang, Pre-Lie analogues of Poisson–Nijenhuis structures and Maurer–Cartan equations. J. Algebra Appl. 21 (2022), no. 6, article no. 2250120, 34 pp. Zbl 1517.17001 MR 4429005
]). The cohomology of the cochain complex (⨁n=1+∞Cn(𝔤,ρ,μ),∂) is called the cohomology of the pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,⋅) with the representation (V;ρ,μ). The corresponding cohomology group is denoted by Hn(𝔤,ρ,μ).
For all f=(f𝔤,fρ,fμ)∈Cn(𝔤,ρ,μ), where f𝔤∈Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤), fρ∈Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗V,V) and fμ∈Hom(∧n−2𝔤⊗V⊗𝔤,V). Then we have
∂f=((∂f)𝔤,(∂f)ρ,(∂f)μ).
By straightforward computation, we obtain that
(2.1)
(∂f)𝔤(x1,…,xn+1)=dregf𝔤(x1,…,xn+1).
(∂f)ρ(x1,…,xn,u) (∂f)=∑i=1n(−1)i+1ρ(f𝔤(x1,…,xi^,…,xn,xi))u (∂f)∑i+∑i=1n(−1)i+1ρ(xi)fρ(x1,…,xi^,…,xn,u) (∂f)∑i−∑i=1n(−1)i+1fρ(x1,…,xi^,…,xn,ρ(xi)u) (∂f)∑i+∑1≤i<j≤n(−1)i+jfρ([xi,xj]C,x1,…,xi^,…,xj^,…,xn,u).
(∂f)μ(x1,…,xn−1,u,xn)   =(−1)n−1(μ(f𝔤(x1,…,xn))u+μ(xn)fρ(x1,…,xn−1,u)   =(−1)n−1(−fρ(x1,…,xn−1,μ(xn)u))     −∑i=1n−1(−1)i+1fμ(x1,…,xi^,…,xn−1,u,xi⋅xn)     +∑i=1n−1(−1)i+1ρ(xi)fμ(x1,…,xi^,…,xn−1,u,xn)     −∑i=1n−1(−1)i+1fμ(x1,…,xi^,…,xn−1,ρ(xi)u,xn)     +∑i=1n−1(−1)i+1μ(xn)fμ(x1,…,xi^,…,xn−1,u,xi)     +∑i=1n−1(−1)i+1fμ(x1,…,xi^,…,xn−1,μ(xi)u,xn)     +∑1≤i<j≤n−1(−1)i+jfμ([xi,xj]C,x1,…,xi^,…,xj^,…,xn−1,u,xn).

3. Maurer–Cartan characterizations and deformations of pre-LieDer pairs

In this section, first, we recall L∞‑algebras and higher derived brackets. Then, we use higher derived brackets to construct an L∞‑algebra. Given a pre-LieDer pair, we can obtain the Maurer–Cartan element of this L∞‑algebra. Finally, we construct a twist L∞‑algebra by this Maurer–Cartan element, which controls deformations of pre-LieDer pairs.

3.1. L∞‑algebras and higher derived brackets

Let 𝔤=⨁k∈ℤ𝔤k be a ℤ-graded vector space. The desuspension operator s−1 changes the grading of 𝔤 according to the rule (s−1𝔤)i:=𝔤i+1. The degree −1 map s−1:𝔤→s−1𝔤 is defined by sending x∈𝔤 to its copy s−1x∈s−1𝔤.
The notion of an L∞‑algebra was introduced by Stasheff in [32
J. Stasheff, Differential graded Lie algebras, quasi-Hopf algebras and higher homotopy algebras. In P. P. Kulish (ed.), Quantum groups, pp. 120–137, Lecture Notes in Math. 1510, Springer, Berlin, 1992 Zbl 0758.17010 MR 1183483
]. See [25
T. Lada and M. Markl, Strongly homotopy Lie algebras. Comm. Algebra 23 (1995), no. 6, 2147–2161 Zbl 0999.17019 MR 1327129
, 26
T. Lada and J. Stasheff, Introduction to SH Lie algebras for physicists. Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 32 (1993), no. 7, 1087–1103 Zbl 0824.17024 MR 1235010
] for more details.

Definition 3.1.

An L∞-algebra is a ℤ-graded vector space 𝔤=⨁k∈ℤ𝔤k equipped with a collection (k≥1) of linear maps lk:⊗k𝔤→𝔤 of degree 1 with the property that, for any homogeneous elements x1,…,xn∈𝔤, we have
  1. (1)
    (graded symmetry) for every σ∈Sn,
    ln(xσ(1),…,xσ(n))=ε(σ)ln(x1,…,xn),
  2. (2)
    (generalized Jacobi identity) for all n≥1,
    ∑i=1n∑σ∈S(i,n−i)ε(σ)ln−i+1(li(xσ(1),…,xσ(i)),xσ(i+1),…,xσ(n))=0,
where ε(σ)=ε(σ;x1,…,xn) is the Koszul sign for a permutation σ∈Sn and xi∈𝔤.
We denote an L∞‑algebra by (𝔤,{lk}k=1+∞).

Definition 3.2.

A Maurer–Cartan element of an L∞‑algebra (𝔤,{lk}k=1+∞) is an element α∈𝔤0 satisfying
(3.1)
∑k=1+∞1k!lk(α,…,α)=0.

Remark 3.3.

In general, the Maurer–Cartan equation (3.1) makes sense when the L∞‑algebra is a filtered L∞‑algebra [14
V. A. Dolgushev and C. L. Rogers, A version of the Goldman–Millson theorem for filtered L∞‐algebras. J. Algebra 430 (2015), 260–302 Zbl 1327.17019 MR 3323983
]. In the following, the L∞‑algebra under consideration satisfies lk=0 for k sufficiently big, so the Maurer–Cartan equation makes sense.
Let α be a Maurer–Cartan element of an L∞‑algebra (𝔤,{lk}k=1+∞). Define lkα:⊗k𝔤→𝔤(k≥1) by
lkα(x1,…,xk)=∑n=0+∞1n!lk+n(α,…,α⏟n,x1,…,xk).

Theorem 3.4

([15
V. Dotsenko, S. Shadrin, and B. Vallette, Maurer–Cartan methods in deformation theory: the twisting procedure. London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 488, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2024, 177 pp. Zbl 1526.53001 MR 4621635
, 20
E. Getzler, Lie theory for nilpotent L∞‐algebras. Ann. of Math. (2) 170 (2009), no. 1, 271–301 Zbl 1246.17025 MR 2521116
]). With the above notation, (𝔤,{lkα}k=1+∞) is an L∞‑algebra which is called the twisted L∞‑algebra by α.

Theorem 3.5

([20
E. Getzler, Lie theory for nilpotent L∞‐algebras. Ann. of Math. (2) 170 (2009), no. 1, 271–301 Zbl 1246.17025 MR 2521116
]). Let (𝔤,{lkα}k=1+∞) be a twist L∞‑algebra by α. Then α+α′ is a Maurer–Cartan element of the L∞‑algebra (𝔤,{lk}k=1+∞) if and only if α′ is a Maurer–Cartan element of the twist L∞‑algebra (𝔤,{lkα}k=1+∞).

Definition 3.6

([35
T. Voronov, Higher derived brackets and homotopy algebras. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 202 (2005), no. 1–3, 133–153 Zbl 1086.17012 MR 2163405
]). A V-data consists of a quadruple (L,𝔥,P,Δ), where
  1. (1)
    (L,[⋅,⋅]) is a graded Lie algebra,
  2. (2)
    𝔥 is an abelian graded Lie subalgebra of (L,[⋅,⋅]),
  3. (3)
    P:L→L is a projection, that is P∘P=P, whose image is 𝔥 and its kernel is a graded Lie subalgebra of (L,[⋅,⋅]),
  4. (4)
    Δ is an element in ker(P)1 such that [Δ,Δ]=0.

Theorem 3.7

([18
Y. Frégier and M. Zambon, Simultaneous deformations and Poisson geometry. Compos. Math. 151 (2015), no. 9, 1763–1790 Zbl 1383.17009 MR 3406444
, 35
T. Voronov, Higher derived brackets and homotopy algebras. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 202 (2005), no. 1–3, 133–153 Zbl 1086.17012 MR 2163405
]). Let (L,𝔥,P,Δ) be a V-data. Then the graded vector space s−1L⊕𝔥 is an L∞‑algebra, where
l1(s−1f,θ) =(−s−1[Δ,f],P(f+[Δ,θ])), l2(s−1f,s−1g) =(−1)|f|s−1[f,g], lk(s−1f,θ1,…,θk−1) =P([⋯[[f,θ1],θ2],…,θk−1]),  k≥2, lk(θ1,…,θk−1,θk) =P([⋯[[Δ,θ1],θ2],…,θk]),  k≥2.
Here θ,θ1,…,θk are homogeneous elements of 𝔥 and f,g are homogeneous elements of L. All the other L∞‑algebra products that are not obtained from the ones written above by permutations of arguments will vanish.
Moreover, if L′ is a graded Lie subalgebra of L that satisfies [Δ,L′]⊂L′, then s−1L′⊕𝔥 is an L∞-subalgebra of the above L∞‑algebra (s−1L⊕𝔥,{lk}k=1+∞).

3.2. The L∞‑algebra that controls deformations of pre-LieDer pairs

Proposition 3.8.

We have a V-data (L,𝔥,P,Δ) as follows:
  1. (1)
    Let 𝔤 and V be vector spaces. The graded Lie algebra (L,[⋅,⋅]) is given by (⨁n=1+∞Hom(∧n−1(𝔤⊕V)⊗(𝔤⊕V),𝔤⊕V),[⋅,⋅]MN).
  2. (2)
    The abelian graded Lie subalgebra 𝔥 is given by
    𝔥=⨁n=0+∞Cn∣−1(𝔤⊕V,𝔤⊕V)=⨁n=0+∞Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,V).
  3. (3)
    P:L→L is a projection onto the subspace 𝔥.
  4. (4)
    Δ=0.
Consequently, we obtain an L∞‑algebra (s−1L⊕𝔥,{lk}k=1+∞), where li are given by
l1(s−1f,θ) =P(f), l2(s−1f,s−1g) =(−1)|f|s−1[f,g]MN, lk(s−1f,θ1,…,θk−1) =P([⋯[[f,θ1]MN,θ2]MN,…,θk−1]MN), k≥2
for homogeneous elements θ,θ1,…,θk−1∈𝔥, f,g∈L and all the other possible combinations vanish.

Proof.

Obviously, 𝔥 is an abelian graded Lie subalgebra of (L,[⋅,⋅]), and Ker(P) is a graded Lie subalgebra of (L,[⋅,⋅]). Thus, (L,𝔥,P,Δ) is a V-data. By Theorem 3.7, we obtain an L∞‑algebra (s−1L⊕𝔥,{lk}k=1+∞).  
We set L′ by
L′ =⨁n=0+∞Cn∣0(𝔤⊕V,𝔤⊕V) =⨁n=0+∞(Hom(∧n𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤)⊕Hom(∧n𝔤⊗V,V)⊕Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗V⊗𝔤,V)).
Now, we give the main result in this subsection.

Theorem 3.9.

With the above notation, (s−1L′⊕𝔥,{lk}k=1+∞) is an L∞‑algebra, where lk are given by
l2(s−1f,s−1g) =(−1)|f|s−1[f,g]MN, l2(s−1f,θ) =P([f,θ]MN), lk(s−1f,θ1,…,θk−1) =0, k≥3
for homogeneous elements θ,θ1,…,θk−1∈𝔥, f,g∈L′ and all the other possible combinations vanish.
Moreover, for all π∈Hom(𝔤⊗𝔤,V), ρ∈Hom(𝔤⊗V,V), μ∈Hom(V⊗𝔤,V) and D∈Hom(𝔤,V), (s−1(π+ρ+μ),D) is a Maurer–Cartan element of the L∞‑algebra (s−1L′⊕𝔥,{lk}k=1+∞) if and only if ((𝔤,π),D,ρ,μ) is a pre-LieDer pair.

Proof.

Obviously, L′ is a graded Lie subalgebra. Since Δ=0, we have [Δ,L′]=0. Thus, (s−1L′⊕𝔥,{lk}k=1+∞) is an L∞‑algebra. It is straightforward to deduce that
[π+ρ+μ,D]MN∈Hom(𝔤⊗𝔤,V), [[π+ρ+μ,D]MN,D]MN=0.
Then, we have
12l2((s−1(π+ρ+μ),D),(s−1(π+ρ+μ),D)) 12l2((=12l2(s−1(π+ρ+μ),s−1(π+ρ+μ))+l2(s−1(π+ρ+μ),D) 12l2((=(−12s−1[π+ρ+μ,π+ρ+μ]MN,P[π+ρ+μ,D]MN) 12l2((=(−12s−1[π+ρ+μ,π+ρ+μ]MN,[π+ρ+μ,D]MN).
Thus, (s−1(π+ρ+μ),D) is a Maurer–Cartan element of the L∞‑algebra (s−1L′⊕𝔥,{lk}k=1+∞) if and only if
[π+ρ+μ,π+ρ+μ]MN=0, [π+ρ+μ,D]MN=0.
By Proposition 2.11, [π+ρ+μ,π+ρ+μ]MN=0 if and only if (V;ρ,μ) is a representation of the pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,π). For all x,y∈𝔤, we have
0 =[π+ρ+μ,D]MN(x,y) =ρ(x,D(y))+μ(D(x),y)−D(π(x,y)) =ρ(x)D(y)+μ(y)D(x)−D(x⋅y),
which implies that [π+ρ+μ,D]MN=0 if and only if D is a derivation of the pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,π) with respect to the representation (V;ρ,μ). Thus, (s−1(π+ρ+μ),D) is a Maurer–Cartan element of the L∞‑algebra (s−1L′⊕𝔥,{lk}k=1+∞) if and only if ((𝔤,π),D,ρ,μ) is a pre-LieDer pair. This finishes the proof.  

Theorem 3.10.

With the above notation, let ((𝔤,π),D,ρ,μ) be a pre-LieDer pair. Then (s−1L′⊕𝔥,{lk(s−1(π+ρ+μ),D)}k=1+∞) is an L∞‑algebra, where lk(s−1(π+ρ+μ),D) are given by
l1(s−1(π+ρ+μ),D)(s−1f,θ) =l2((s−1(π+ρ+μ),D),(s−1f,θ)), l2(s−1(π+ρ+μ),D)((s−1f1,θ1),(s−1f2,θ2)) =l2((s−1f1,θ1),(s−1f2,θ2)), lk(s−1(π+ρ+μ),D)((s−1f1,θ1),…,(s−1fkθk)) =0, k≥3.
Furthermore, for all π′∈Hom(𝔤⊗𝔤,V), ρ′∈Hom(𝔤⊗V,V), μ′∈Hom(V⊗𝔤,V) and D′∈Hom(𝔤,V), ((𝔤,π+π′),D+D′,ρ+ρ′,μ+μ′) is a pre-LieDer pair if and only if (s−1(π′+ρ′+μ′),D′) is a Maurer–Cartan element of the twist L∞‑algebra (s−1L′⊕𝔥,{lk(s−1(π+ρ+μ),D)}k=1+∞).

Proof.

By Theorem 3.9, ((𝔤,π+π′),D+D′,ρ+ρ′,μ+μ′) is a pre-LieDer pair if and only if (s−1(π+π′+ρ+ρ′+μ+μ′),D+D′) is a Maurer–Cartan element of the L∞‑algebra (s−1L′⊕𝔥,{lk}k=1+∞). By Theorem 3.5, (s−1(π+π′+ρ+ρ′+μ+μ′),D+D′) is a Maurer–Cartan element of the L∞‑algebra (s−1L′⊕𝔥,{lk}k=1+∞) if and only if (s−1(π′+ρ′+μ′),D′) is a Maurer–Cartan element of the twist L∞‑algebra (s−1L′⊕𝔥,{lk(s−1(π+ρ+μ),D)}k=1+∞).  

4. Cohomologies and infinitesimal deformations of pre-LieDer pairs

In this section, first, we give the cohomology of pre-LieDer pairs. Then, we study infinitesimal deformations of pre-LieDer pairs by using this cohomology. We show that equivalent infinitesimal deformations are in the same second cohomology group. Finally, we use this cohomology to give the cohomology of regular pre-LieDer pairs.
In this section, We will also denote the pre-Lie multiplication “⋅” by π.

4.1. Cohomologies of pre-LieDer pairs

Cn(𝔤,ρ,μ,D) :=Cn(𝔤,ρ,μ)⊕Cn−1(𝔤;V) =Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤)⊕Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗V,V) =H⊕Hom(∧n−2𝔤⊗V⊗𝔤,V)⊕Hom(∧n−2𝔤⊗𝔤,V).
Define the coboundary operator 𝒟:Cn(𝔤,ρ,μ,D)→Cn+1(𝔤,ρ,μ,D) by
(4.1)
𝒟(f,θ)=(−1)n−2l1(s−1(π+ρ+μ),D)(s−1f,θ),
where f∈Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤)⊕Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗V,V)⊕Hom(∧n−2𝔤⊗V⊗𝔤,V) and θ∈Hom(∧n−2𝔤⊗𝔤,V).

Theorem 4.1.

(⨁n=1+∞Cn(𝔤,ρ,μ,D),𝒟) is a cochain complex, that is, 𝒟∘𝒟=0.

Proof.

By Theorem 3.10, we obtain that (s−1L′⊕𝔥,{lk(s−1(π+ρ+μ),D)}k=1+∞) is an L∞‑algebra. Thus, we have l1(s−1(π+ρ+μ),D)∘l1(s−1(π+ρ+μ),D)=0, which implies that 𝒟∘𝒟=0.  

Definition 4.2.

The cohomology of the cochain complex (⨁n=1+∞Cn(𝔤,ρ,μ,D),𝒟) is called the cohomology of the pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D,ρ,μ). The corresponding cohomology group is denoted by Hn(𝔤,ρ,μ,D).
In the sequel, by straightforward computation, we give the explicit formula of the operator 𝒟. For all f∈Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤)⊕Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗V,V)⊕Hom(∧n−2𝔤⊗V⊗𝔤,V) and θ∈Hom(∧n−2𝔤⊗𝔤,V), we have
∥[π+ρ+μ,f]MN∥=n∣0, ∥[π+ρ+μ,θ]MN∥=n∣−1, ∥[f,D]MN∥=n∣−1.
Thus, by (4.1), we have
𝒟(f,θ) =(−1)n−2l1(s−1(π+ρ+μ),D)(s−1f,θ) =(−1)n−2l2((s−1(π+ρ+μ),D),(s−1f,θ)) =(−1)n−2(l2(s−1(π+ρ+μ),s−1f)+l2(s−1(π+ρ+μ),θ) =(−1)n−2(+l2(D,s−1f)) =(−1)n−2(−s−1[π+ρ+μ,f]MN,P[π+ρ+μ,θ]MN+P[f,D]MN) =(−1)n−2(−s−1[π+ρ+μ,f]MN,[π+ρ+μ,θ]MN+[f,D]MN) =(∂f,dθ+δf).

Lemma 4.3.

With the above notation, for all f=(f𝔤,fρ,fμ)∈Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤)⊕Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗V,V)⊕Hom(∧n−2𝔤⊗V⊗𝔤,V), δ:Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤)⊕Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗V,V)⊕Hom(∧n−2𝔤⊗V⊗𝔤,V)→Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,V) is given by
(δf)(x1,…,xn−1,xn) (δf)=∑i=1n−1(−1)i+1fμ(x1,…,xi^,…,xn−1,D(xi),xn) (δf)∑i+(−1)n−2⋅(fρ(x1,…,xn−1,D(xn))−D(f𝔤(x1,…,xn))).

Proof.

For all x1,…,xn∈𝔤, we have
(δf)(x1,…,xn)   =(−1)n−2[f,D]MN(x1,…,xn)   =(−1)n−2(∑i=1n−1(−1)i+1fμ(D(xi),x1,…,xi^,…,xn)   =(−1)n−2(+fρ(x1,…,xn−1,D(xn))−D(f𝔤(x1,…,xn)))   =∑i=1n−1(−1)i+1fμ(x1,…,xi^,…,xn−1,D(xi),xn)     +(−1)n−2(fρ(x1,…,xn−1,D(xn))−D(f𝔤(x1,…,xn))).
The proof is finished.  
For all f=(f𝔤,fρ,fμ)∈Hom(𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤)⊕Hom(𝔤⊗V,V)⊕Hom(V⊗𝔤,V), θ∈Hom(𝔤,V), x1,x2,x3∈𝔤, and u∈V, we have
(∂f)𝔤(x1,x2,x3) =x1⋅f𝔤(x2,x3)+x2⋅f𝔤(x1,x3)+f𝔤(x2,x1)⋅x3 i=i−f𝔤(x1,x2)⋅x3−f𝔤(x2,x1⋅x3)+f𝔤(x1,x2⋅x3) i=i−f𝔤(x1⋅x2−x2⋅x1,x3). (∂f)ρ(x1,x2,u) =ρ(f𝔤(x2,x1))u−ρ(f𝔤(x1,x2))u+ρ(x1)fρ(x2,u) i=i−ρ(x2)fρ(x1,u)−fρ(x2,ρ(x1)u)+fρ(x1,ρ(x2)u) i=i−fρ(x1⋅x2−x2⋅x1,u). (∂f)μ(x1,u,x2) =−(μ(f𝔤(x1,x2))u+μ(x2)fρ(x1,u)−fρ(x1,μ(x2)u)) i=i−fμ(u,x1⋅x2)+ρ(x1)fμ(u,x2)−fμ(ρ(x1)u,x2) i=i+μ(x2)fμ(u,x1)+fμ(μ(x1)u,x2). (dθ+δf)(x1,x2) =ρ(x1)f(x2)+μ(x2)f(x1)−f(x1⋅x2)+fμ(D(x1),x2) i=i+fρ(x1,D(x2))−D(f𝔤(x1,x2)).
By ∂f=((∂f)𝔤,(∂f)ρ,(∂f)μ) and 𝒟(f,θ)=(∂f,dθ+δf). We obtain the 2-coboundary operator of the pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D,ρ,μ).
The following diagram well explains the above operators.
At the end of this subsection, we give the relation between various cohomologies groups.

Theorem 4.4.

There is a short exact sequence of the cochain complexes:
0⟶(⨁n=0+∞Cn(𝔤;V),d)→𝜄(⨁n=0+∞Cn(𝔤,ρ,μ,D),𝒟)→𝑝(⨁n=0+∞Cn(𝔤,ρ,μ),∂)⟶0,
where ι(θ)=(0,θ) and p(f,θ)=f for all f∈Cn(𝔤,ρ,μ) and θ∈Cn−1(𝔤;V).
Consequently, there is a long exact sequence of the cohomology groups:
⋯⟶Hn(𝔤;V)→Hn(ι)Hn(𝔤,ρ,μ,D)→Hn(p)Hn(𝔤,ρ,μ)→cnHn+1(𝔤;V)⟶⋯,
where the connecting map cn is defined by cn([α])=[δ(α)], for all [α]∈Hn(𝔤,π,ρ,μ).

Proof.

By the explicit formula of the coboundary operator 𝒟, we have the short exact sequence of chain complexes which induces a long exact sequence of cohomology groups.  

4.2. Infinitesimal deformations of pre-LieDer pairs

Definition 4.5.

Let ((𝔤,π),D,ρ,μ) be a pre-LieDer pair. If for all t∈𝕂, ((𝔤,πt=π+tω),Dt=D+tD^,ρt=ρ+tσ,μt=μ+tτ) is a pre-LieDer pair, where ω:𝔤⊗𝔤→𝔤,σ:𝔤⊗V→𝔤,τ:V⊗𝔤→𝔤 and D^:𝔤→V are linear maps. We say that (ω,σ,τ,D^) generates an infinitesimal deformation of the pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,π),D,ρ,μ).
It is direct to check that (ω,σ,τ,D^) generates an infinitesimal deformation of the pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,π),D,ρ,μ) if and only if for all x,y∈𝔤, the following equalities are satisfied:
(4.2)
[π+ρ+μ,ω+σ+τ]MN=0,
(4.3)
[ω+σ+τ,ω+σ+τ]MN=0,
(4.4)
[π+ρ+μ,D^]MN+[ω+σ+τ,D]MN=0,
(4.5)
[ω+σ+τ,D^]MN=0.
Obviously, (ω,σ,τ)∈C2(𝔤,π,ρ,μ), (4.2) means that (ω,σ,τ) is a 2-cocycle of the pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,π) with the representation (V;ρ,μ), that is, ∂(ω,σ,τ)=0. Equation (4.3) means that (V;σ,τ) is a representation of the pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,ω). Equation (4.4) means that dD^+δ(ω,σ,τ)=0. (4.5) means that ((𝔤,ω),D^,σ,τ) is a pre-LieDer pair. By (4.2) and (4.4), we have
𝒟(ω,σ,τ,D^)=(∂(ω,σ,τ),dD^+δ(ω,σ,τ))=0.

Theorem 4.6.

With the above notation, (ω,σ,τ,D^) is a 2-cocycle of the pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,D),ρ,μ).

Definition 4.7.

Let (πt′=π+tω′,ρt′=ρ+tσ′,μt′=μ+tτ′,Dt′=D+tD^′) and (πt=π+tω,ρt=ρ+tσ,μt=μ+tτ,Dt=D+tD^) be two infinitesimal deformations of the pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,π),D,ρ,μ). We call them equivalent if there exist N∈𝔤𝔩(𝔤) and S∈𝔤𝔩(V) such that (Id𝔤+tN,IdV+tS) is a homomorphism from the pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,πt′),Dt′,ρt′,μt′) to the pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,πt),Dt,ρt,μt), that is, for all x,y∈𝔤, the following equalities hold:
(Id𝔤+tN)(x⋅t′y) =(Id𝔤+tN)(x)⋅t(Id𝔤+tN)(y), (IdV+tS)∘ρt′(x) =ρt((Id𝔤+tN)(x))∘(IdV+tS), (IdV+tS)∘μt′(x) =μt((Id𝔤+tN)(x))∘(IdV+tS), (IdV+tS)∘Dt′ =Dt∘(Id𝔤+tN).
An infinitesimal deformation is said to be trivial if it is equivalent to (π,ρ,μ,D).
By direct calculations, (πt′,ρt′,μt′,Dt′) and (πt,ρt,μt,Dt) are infinitesimal equivalent deformations if and only if for all x,y∈𝔤,u∈V, the following equalities hold:
(4.6)
ω′(x,y)−ω(x,y) =N(x)⋅y+x⋅N(y)−N(x⋅y), N(ω′(x,y)) =N(x)⋅N(y)+ω(x,N(y))+ω(N(x),y), ω(N(x),N(y)) =0,
(4.7)
σ′(x)u−σ(x)u =ρ(x)S(u)+ρ(N(x))u−S(ρ(x)u), S(σ′(x)u) =ρ(N(x))S(u)+σ(x)S(u)+σ(N(x))u, σ(N(x))S(u) =0,
(4.8)
τ′(x)u−τ(x)u =μ(x)S(u)+μ(N(x))u−S(μ(x)u), S(τ′(x)u) =μ(N(x))S(u)+τ(x)S(u)+τ(N(x))u, τ(N(x))S(u) =0,
(4.9)
D^′(x)−D^(x) =D(N(x))−S(D(x)), S(D^′(x)) =D^(N(x)).
We summarize the above discussion into the following conclusion.

Theorem 4.8.

Let ((𝔤,π),D,ρ,μ) be a pre-LieDer pair. If two infinitesimal deformations (πt′=π+tω′,ρt′=ρ+tσ′,μt′=μ+tτ′,Dt′=D+tD^′) and (πt=π+tω,ρt=ρ+tσ,μt=μ+tτ,Dt=D+tD^) are equivalent, then (ω′,σ′,τ′,D^′) and (ω,σ,τ,D^) are in the same cohomology class of H2(𝔤,ρ,μ,D).

Proof.

By Theorem 4.6, we obtain that (ω′,σ′,τ′,D^′),(ω,σ,τ,D^)∈Z2(𝔤,ρ,μ,D). Obviously, (N,S)∈C1(𝔤,ρ,μ,D). For all x,y∈𝔤,u,v∈V, by (4.6), (4.7) and (4.8), we have
((ω′,σ′,τ′)−(ω,σ,τ))((x,u),(y,v)) ω′,σ=(N(x)⋅y+x⋅N(y)−N(x⋅y),ρ(x)S(v)+ρ(N(x))v−S(ρ(x)v), μ(y)S(u)+μ(N(y))u−S(μ(y)u)) (y)S=∂(N,S)((x,u),(y,v)),
which implies that (ω′,σ′,τ′)−(ω,σ,τ)=∂(N,S). For all x∈𝔤, by (4.9), we have
(D^′−D^)(x)=D(N(x))−S(D(x))=δ(N,S)(x),
which implies that D^′−D^=δ(N,S). Thus, we have
(ω′,σ′,τ′,D^′)−(ω,σ,τ,D^)=(∂(N,S),δ(N,S))=𝒟(N,S).
This finishes the proof.  

4.3. Cohomologies of regular pre-LieDer pairs

Let ((𝔤,⋅),D) be a regular pre-LieDer pair. Define the set of 0-cochains C0(𝔤,D) to be 0, and define the set of 1-cochains C1(𝔤,D) to be Hom(𝔤,𝔤). For n≥2, define the set of n-cochains Cn(𝔤,D) by
Cn(𝔤,D):=Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤)⊕Hom(∧n−2𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤).
For all f∈Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤) and θ∈Hom(∧n−2𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤). Define the embedding i:Cn(𝔤,D)→Cn(𝔤,L,R,D) by
i(f,θ)=(f,f,f,θ).
Denote by Imn(i)=i(Cn(𝔤,D)). Then, we have the following.

Proposition 4.9.

With the above notation, (⨁n=0+∞Imn(i),𝒟) is a subcomplex of the cochain complex (⨁n=0+∞Cn(𝔤,L,R,D),𝒟).

Proof.

For all f∈Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤), θ∈Hom(∧n−2𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤), (f,f,f,θ)∈Imn(i), we have
𝒟(f,f,f,θ) =(∂(f,f,f),dθ+δ(f,f,f)) =(∂(f,f,f)𝔤,∂(f,f,f)ρ,∂(f,f,f)μ,dregθ+δ(f,f,f)).
By (2.1), we have ∂(f,f,f)𝔤=dregf. By straightforward computation, we have ∂(f,f,f)ρ=dregf and ∂(f,f,f)μ=dregf. The detail is given in Appendix. Thus, we obtain that
𝒟(f,f,f,θ)=(dregf,dregf,dregf,dregθ+δ(f,f,f))=i(dregf,dregθ+δ(f,f,f)),
which implies that (⨁n=0+∞Imn(i),𝒟) is a subcomplex.  
Define the projection p:Imn(i)→Cn(𝔤,D) by
p(f,f,f,θ)=(f,θ) ∀f∈Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤),θ∈Hom(∧n−2𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤).
Then, for n≥1, we define 𝒟¯:Cn(𝔤,D)→Cn+1(𝔤,D) by 𝒟¯=p∘𝒟∘i. More precisely, we have
𝒟¯(f,θ)=(dregf,dregθ+Ωf) ∀f∈Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤),θ∈Hom(∧n−2𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤),
where Ω:Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤)→Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,𝔤) is given by
Ω(f)(x1,…,xn) =(−1)n−2(Σi=1nf(x1,…,xi−1,D(xi),xi+1,…,xn) =(−1)n−2(−D(f(x1,…,xn))).

Theorem 4.10.

With the above notation, (⨁n=0+∞Cn(𝔤,D),𝒟¯) is a cochain complex, that is, D¯∘D¯=0.

Proof.

By 𝒟¯=p∘𝒟∘i and i∘p=Id, we have
D¯∘D¯=p∘D∘i∘p∘D∘i=p∘D∘D∘i=0.
This finishes the proof.  

Definition 4.11.

The cohomology of the cochain complex (⨁n=1+∞Cn(𝔤,D),𝒟¯) is taken to be the cohomology of the regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D). The corresponding cohomology group is denoted by Hn(𝔤,D).

5. Abelian extensions of regular pre-LieDer pairs

In this section, first, we introduce the notion of representations of regular pre-LieDer pairs. Then, we give cohomologies of regular pre-LieDer pairs with coefficients in an arbitrary representation. Finally, we study abelian extensions of regular pre-LieDer pairs using this cohomological approach. We show that abelian extensions are classified by the second cohomology group.

Definition 5.1.

A representation of a regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D) on a vector space V with respect to linear map K:V→V consists of a pair (ρ~,μ~), where (V;ρ~,μ~) is a representation of the pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,⋅) such that for all x∈𝔤,u∈V, the following equalities are satisfied:
(5.1)
K(ρ~(x)u)=ρ~(x)K(u)+ρ~(D(x))u,
(5.2)
K(μ~(x)u)=μ~(x)K(u)+μ~(D(x))u.
We denote a representation by (V,K,ρ~,μ~). Let L~,R~:𝔤→𝔤𝔩(𝔤) be linear maps, where L~xy=x⋅y,R~xy=y⋅x. Then (𝔤,D,L~,R~) is called a regular representation.
We define a bilinear operation ⋅⋉:⊗2(𝔤⊕V)→(𝔤⊕V) by
(x+u)⋅⋉(y+v):=x⋅y+ρ~(x)(v)+μ~(y)(u) ∀x,y∈𝔤,u,v∈V
and a linear map D+K:𝔤⊕V→𝔤⊕V by
(D+K)(x+u):=D(x)+K(u) ∀x∈𝔤,u∈V.

Proposition 5.2.

With the above notation, ((𝔤⊕V,⋅⋉),D+K) is a regular pre-LieDer pair, which is denoted by (𝔤⋉(ρ~,μ~)V,D+K) and called the semi-direct product of the regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D) and the representation (V,K,ρ~,μ~).

Proof.

Since (V;ρ~,μ~) is a representation of the pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,⋅), it is obvious that (𝔤⊕V,⋅⋉) is a pre-Lie algebra. For all x,y∈𝔤,u,v∈V, by (5.1) and (5.2), we have
(D+K)((x+u)⋅⋉(y+v)) (D+=D(x⋅y)+K(ρ~(x)v)+K(μ~(y)u) (D+=D(x)⋅y+x⋅D(y)+ρ~(x)K(v)+ρ~(D(x))v+μ~(y)K(u)+μ~(D(y))u (D+=(x+u)⋅⋉(D+K)(y+v)+(D+K)(x+u)⋅⋉(y+v),
which implies that D+K is a derivation of the pre-Lie algebra (𝔤⊕V,⋅⋉). Thus, ((𝔤⊕V,⋅⋉),D+K) is a regular pre-LieDer pair.  
Let (V,K,ρ~,μ~) be a representation of the regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D). Define the set of 0-cochains C0(𝔤,D;V,K,ρ~,μ~) to be 0, and define the set of 1-cochains C1(𝔤,D;V,K,ρ~,μ~) to be Hom(𝔤,V). For n≥2, define the set of n-cochains Cn(𝔤,D;V,K,ρ~,μ~) by
Cn(𝔤,D;V,K,ρ~,μ~):=Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,V)⊕Hom(∧n−2𝔤⊗𝔤,V).
For all f∈Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,V) and θ∈Hom(∧n−2𝔤⊗𝔤,V), define the coboundary operator 𝒟(ρ~,μ~):Cn(𝔤,D;V,K,ρ~,μ~)→Cn+1(𝔤,D;V,K,ρ~,μ~) by
𝒟(ρ~,μ~)(f,θ)=(d(ρ~,μ~)f,d(ρ~,μ~)θ+Ω(ρ~,μ~)f),
where d(ρ~,μ~) is the coboundary operator of the pre-Lie algebra (𝔤,⋅) with coefficients in the representation (V,ρ~,μ~) and Ω(ρ~,μ~):Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,V)→Hom(∧n−1𝔤⊗𝔤,V) is defined by
Ω(f)(x1,…,xn) =(−1)n−2(Σi=1nf(x1,…,xi−1,D(xi),xi+1,…,xn) =(−1)n−2(−K(f(x1,…,xn))).

Theorem 5.3.

With the above notation, (⨁n=0+∞Cn(𝔤,D;V,K,ρ~,μ~),𝒟(ρ~,μ~)) is a cochain complex, that is, 𝒟(ρ~,μ~)∘𝒟(ρ~,μ~)=0.

Proof.

By Proposition 5.2, we obtain that (𝔤⋉(ρ,μ)V,D+K) is a regular pre-LieDer pair. By Theorem 4.10, (⨁n=0+∞Cn(𝔤⊕V,D+K),𝒟¯) is a cochain complex. It is straightforward to deduce that (⨁n=0+∞Cn(𝔤,D;V,K,ρ~,μ~),𝒟(ρ~,μ~)) is a subcomplex of (⨁n=0+∞Cn(𝔤⊕V,D+K),𝒟¯). Thus, we obtain that 𝒟(ρ~,μ~)∘𝒟(ρ~,μ~)=0.  

Definition 5.4.

The cohomology of (⨁n=1+∞Cn(𝔤,D;V,K,ρ~,μ~),𝒟(ρ~,μ~)) is called the cohomology of the regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D) with coefficients in the representation (V,K,ρ~,μ~). The corresponding cohomology group is denoted by Hn(𝔤,D;V,K,ρ~,μ~).

Definition 5.5.

Let ((𝔤,⋅),D) and ((V,⋅V),K) be two regular pre-LieDer pairs. An extension of ((𝔤,⋅),D) by ((V,⋅V),K) is a short exact sequence of pre-LieDer pair morphisms
where ((𝔤^,⋅𝔤^),D^) is a regular pre-LieDer pair.
It is called an abelian extension if (V,⋅V) is an abelian pre-Lie algebra, that is, for all u,v∈V,u⋅Vv=0.

Definition 5.6.

A section of an extension ((𝔤^,⋅𝔤^),D^) of a regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D) by ((V,⋅V),K) is a linear map s:𝔤→𝔤^ such that p∘s=Id𝔤.
Let ((𝔤^,⋅𝔤^),D^) be an abelian extension of a regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D) by ((V,⋅V),K) and s:𝔤→𝔤^ a section. For all x,y∈𝔤, define linear maps θ:𝔤⊗𝔤→V and ξ:𝔤→V, respectively, by
θ(x,y) =s(x)⋅𝔤^s(y)−s(x⋅y), ξ(x) =D^(s(x))−s(D(x)).
And for all x,y∈𝔤,u∈V, define ρ~,μ~:𝔤→𝔤𝔩(V), respectively, by
ρ~(x)(u) =s(x)⋅𝔤^u, μ~(x)(u) =u⋅𝔤^s(x).
Obviously, 𝔤^ is isomorphic to 𝔤⊕V as vector spaces. Transfer the regular pre-LieDer pair structure on 𝔤^ to that on 𝔤⊕V, we obtain a regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤⊕V,⋄),ϕ), where ⋄ and ϕ are given by
(x+u)⋄(y+v) =x⋅y+θ(x,y)+ρ~(x)(v)+μ~(y)(u)  ∀x,y∈𝔤,u,v∈V, ϕ(x+u) =D(x)+ξ(x)+K(u)  ∀x∈𝔤,u∈V.

Theorem 5.7.

With the above notation, (V,K,ρ~,μ~) is a representation of the regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D). Moreover, this representation is independent of the choice of sections.

Proof.

For all x,y∈𝔤, u∈V, by the definition of a pre-Lie algebra, we have
0 =(x⋄y)⋄u−x⋄(y⋄u) (=x−(y⋄x)⋄u+y⋄(x⋄u) =(x⋅y+θ(x,y))⋄u−x⋄ρ~(y)(u) (=x−(y⋅x+θ(y,x))⋄u+y⋄ρ~(x)(u) =ρ~(x⋅y)u−ρ~(x)ρ~(y)u−ρ~(y⋅x)u+ρ~(y)ρ~(x)u,
which implies that
(5.3)
ρ~([x,y]C)=ρ~(x)∘ρ~(y)−ρ~(y)∘ρ~(x).
Similarly, we have
(5.4)
μ~(y)∘μ~(x)−μ~(x⋅y)=μ~(y)∘ρ~(x)−ρ~(x)∘μ~(y).
For all x∈𝔤, u∈V, we have
0 =ϕ(x⋄u)−ϕ(x)⋄u−x⋄ϕ(u) =ϕ(ρ~(x)u)−(D(x)+ξ(x))⋄u−x⋄K(u) =K(ρ~(x)u)−ρ~(D(x))u−ρ~(x)K(u),
which implies that
(5.5)
K(ρ~(x)u)=ρ~(x)K(u)+ρ~(D(x))u.
Similarly, we have
(5.6)
K(μ~(x)u)=μ~(x)K(u)+μ~(D(x))u.
Thus, by (5.3), (5.4), (5.5) and (5.6), we obtain that (V,K,ρ~,μ~) is a representation.
Let s′ be another section and (V,K,ρ~′,μ~′) be the corresponding representation of the regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D). Since s(x)−s′(x)∈V, then we have
ρ~(x)u−ρ~′(x)u=(s(x)−s′(x))⋅𝔤^u=0,
which implies that ρ~=ρ~′. Similarly, we have μ~=μ~′. Thus, this representation is independent of the choice of sections.  

Theorem 5.8.

With the above notation, (θ,ξ) is a 2-cocycle of the regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D) with coefficients in the representation (V,K,ρ~,μ~).

Proof.

For all x,y,z∈𝔤, by the definition of a pre-Lie algebra, we have
0 =(x⋄y)⋄z−x⋄(y⋄z)−(y⋄x)⋄z+y⋄(x⋄z) =(x⋅y+θ(x,y))⋄z−x⋄(y⋅z+θ(y,z)) (=x−(y⋅x+θ(y,x))⋄z+y⋄(x⋅z+θ(x,z)) =θ(x⋅y,z)+μ~(z)θ(x,y)−θ(x,y⋅z)−ρ~(x)θ(y,z) (=x−θ(y⋅x,z)−μ~(z)θ(y,x)+θ(y,x⋅z)+ρ~(y)θ(x,z) =−d(ρ~,μ~)θ(x,y)
which implies that d(ρ~,μ~)θ=0. For all x,y∈𝔤,u,v∈V, we have
0 =ϕ((x+u)⋄(y+v))−ϕ(x+u)⋄(y+v)−(x+u)⋄ϕ(y+v) =ϕ(x⋅y+θ(x,y)+ρ~(x)v+μ~(y)u)−(D(x)+ξ(x)+K(u))⋄(y+v) (=x−(x+u)⋄(D(y)+ξ(y)+K(v)) =K(θ(x,y))+ξ(x⋅y)−μ~(y)ξ(x)−θ(D(x),y)−ρ~(x)ξ(y)−θ(x,D(y)) =−(d(ρ~,μ~)ξ+Ω(ρ~,μ~)θ)(x,y),
which implies that d(ρ~,μ~)ξ+Ω(ρ~,μ~)θ=0.
Thus, we obtain that 𝒟(ρ~,μ~)(θ,ξ)=0, which implies that (θ,ξ) is a 2-cocycle of the regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D) with coefficients in the representation (V,K,ρ~,μ~). The proof is finished.  

Definition 5.9.

Let ((𝔤^1,⋅𝔤^1),D𝔤^1) and ((𝔤^2,⋅𝔤^2),D𝔤^2) be two abelian extensions of a regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D) by ((V,⋅V),K). They are said to be isomorphic if there exists a regular pre-LieDer pair isomorphism ζ:((𝔤^1,⋅𝔤^1),D𝔤^1)→((𝔤^2,⋅𝔤^2),D𝔤^2) such that the following diagram is commutative.

Lemma 5.10.

Let ((𝔤^1,⋅𝔤^1),D𝔤^1) and ((𝔤^2,⋅𝔤^2),D𝔤^2) be two isomorphic abelian extensions of a regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D) by ((V,⋅V),K). Then they give rise to the same representation of ((𝔤,⋅),D).

Proof.

Let s1:𝔤1→𝔤^1 and s2:𝔤2→𝔤^2 be two sections of ((𝔤^1,⋅𝔤^1),D𝔤^1) and ((𝔤^2,⋅𝔤^2),D𝔤^2), respectively. By Theorem 5.7, we obtain that (V,K,ρ~1,μ~1) and (V,K,ρ~2,μ~2) are their representations, respectively. Define s1′:𝔤1→𝔤^1 by s1′=ζ−1∘s2. Since ζ:((𝔤^1,⋅𝔤^1),D𝔤^1)→((𝔤^2,⋅𝔤^2),D𝔤^2) is a pre-LieDer pair isomorphism satisfying the commutative diagram in Definition 5.9, by p2∘ζ=p1, we have
p1∘s1′=p2∘ζ∘ζ−1∘s2=Id𝔤.
Thus, we obtain that s1′ is a section of ((𝔤^1,⋅𝔤^1),D𝔤^1). For all x∈𝔤,u∈V, we have
ρ~1(x)(u)=s1′(x)⋅𝔤^1u=(ζ−1∘s2)(x)⋅𝔤^1u=ζ−1(s2(x)⋅𝔤^2u)=ρ~2(x)(u),
which implies that ρ~1=ρ~2. Similarly, we have μ~1=μ~2. This finishes the proof.  
So in the sequel, we fixed a representation (V,K,ρ~,μ~) of a regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D) and consider abelian extensions that induce the given representation.

Theorem 5.11.

Abelian extensions of a regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D) by ((V,⋅V),K) are classified by the second cohomology group H2(𝔤,D;V,K,ρ~,μ~).

Proof.

Let ((𝔤^,⋅𝔤^),D^) be an abelian extension of a regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D) by ((V,⋅V),K). Choosing a section s:𝔤→𝔤^, by Theorem 5.8, we obtain that (θ,ξ)∈Z2(𝔤,D;V,K,ρ~,μ~). Now we show that the cohomological class of (θ,ξ) does not depend on the choice of sections. In fact, let s and s′ be two different sections. Define φ:𝔤→V by φ(x)=s(x)−s′(x). Then for all x,y∈𝔤, we have
θ(x,y) =s(x)⋅𝔤^s(y)−s(x⋅y) =(s′(x)+φ(x))⋅𝔤^(s′(y)+φ(y))−s′(x⋅y)−φ(x⋅y) =s′(x)⋅𝔤^s′(y)+ρ~(x)φ(y)+μ~(y)φ(x)−s′(x⋅y)−φ(x⋅y) =θ′(x,y)+d(ρ~,μ~)φ(x,y),
which implies that θ−θ′=d(ρ~,μ~)φ. Similarly, we have ξ−ξ′=Ω(ρ~,μ~)φ.
Therefore, we obtain that (θ−θ′,ξ−ξ′)=(d(ρ~,μ~)φ,Ω(ρ~,μ~)φ)=𝒟(ρ~,μ~)φ, (θ,ξ) and (θ′,ξ′) are in the same cohomological class.
Now we go on to prove that isomorphic abelian extensions give rise to the same element in H2(𝔤,D;V,K,ρ~,μ~). Assume that ((𝔤^1,⋅𝔤^1),D𝔤^1) and ((𝔤^2,⋅𝔤^2),D𝔤^2) are two isomorphic abelian extensions of a regular pre-LieDer pair ((𝔤,⋅),D) by ((V,⋅V),K), and ζ:((𝔤^1,⋅𝔤^1),D𝔤^1)→((𝔤^2,⋅𝔤^2),D𝔤^2) is a pre-LieDer pair isomorphism satisfying the commutative diagram in Definition 5.9. Assume that s1:𝔤→𝔤^1 is a section of 𝔤^1. By p2∘ζ=p1, we have
p2∘(ζ∘s1)=p1∘s1=Id𝔤.
Thus, we obtain that ζ∘s1 is a section of 𝔤^2. Define s2=ζ∘s1. Since ζ is an isomorphism of pre-LieDer pair and ζ∣V=IdV, for all x,y∈𝔤, we have
θ2(x,y) =s2(x)⋅𝔤^2s2(y)−s2(x⋅y) =(ζ∘s1)(x)⋅𝔤^2(ζ∘s1)(y)−(ζ∘s1)(x⋅y) =ζ(s1(x)⋅𝔤^1s1(y)−s1(x⋅y)) =θ1(x,y).
Similarly, we have ξ1=ξ2. Thus, isomorphic abelian extensions give rise to the same element in H2(𝔤,D;V,K,ρ~,μ~).
Given two 2-cocycles (θ1,ξ1) and (θ2,ξ2), we construct two abelian extensions ((𝔤⊕V,⋄1),ϕ1) and ((𝔤⊕V,⋄2),ϕ2). If (θ1,ξ1),(θ2,ξ2)∈H2(𝔤,D;V,K,ρ~,μ~), then there exists φ:𝔤→V such that θ1=θ2+d(ρ~,μ~)φ and ξ1=ξ2+Ω(ρ~,μ~)φ. We define ζ:𝔤⊕V→𝔤⊕V by
ζ(x+u)=x+u+φ(x) ∀x∈𝔤,u∈V.
For all x,y∈𝔤,u,v∈V, by θ1=θ2+d(ρ~,μ~)φ, we have
ζ((x+u)⋄1(y+v))−ζ(x+u)⋄2ζ(y+v) ζ((x=ζ(x⋅y+θ1(x,y)+ρ~(x)(v)+μ~(y)(u)) ζ((x−(x−(x+u+φ(x))⋄2(y+v+φ(y)) ζ((x=θ1(x,y)+φ(x⋅y)−θ2(x,y)−ρ~(x)φ(y)−μ~(y)φ(x) ζ((x=θ1(x,y)−θ2(x,y)−d(ρ~,μ~)φ(x,y)=0,
and for all x∈𝔤,u∈V, by ξ1=ξ2+Ω(ρ~,μ~)φ, we have
ζ∘ϕ1(x+u)−ϕ2∘ζ(x+u) ζ∘ϕ=ζ(D(x)+ξ1(x)+K(u))−ϕ2(x+u+φ(x)) ζ∘ϕ=ξ1(x)+φ(D(x))−ξ2(x)−K(φ(x)) ζ∘ϕ=ξ1(x)−ξ2(x)−Ω(ρ~,μ~)φ(x)=0.
Thus, ζ is a pre-LieDer pair isomorphism from ((𝔤⊕V,⋄1),ϕ1) to ((𝔤⊕V,⋄2),ϕ2). Moreover, it is obvious that the diagram in Definition 5.9 is commutative. This finishes the proof.  

A. The proof of Proposition 4.9

For all x1,…,xn+1∈𝔤, we have
∂(f,f,f)ρ(x1,…,xn+1) ∂ff=∑i=1n(−1)i+1f(x1,…,xi^,…,xn,xi)⋅xn+1 ∂(f,f∑+∑i=1n(−1)i+1xi⋅f(x1,…,xi^,…,xn+1) ∂(f,f∑−∑i=1n(−1)i+1f(x1,…,xi^,…,xn,xi⋅xn+1) ∂(f,f∑+∑1≤i<j≤n(−1)i+jf([xi,xj]C,x1,…,xi^,…,xj^,…,xn+1) ∂ff=dregf(x1,…,xn+1)
and
∂(f,f,f)μ(x1,…,xn+1)   =(−1)n−1(xn⋅f(x1,…,xn−1,xn+1)+f(x1,…,xn)⋅xn+1   =(−1)n−1(−f(x1,…,xn−1,xn⋅xn+1))     −∑i=1n−1(−1)i+1f(x1,…,xi^,…,xn,xi⋅xn+1)     +∑i=1n−1(−1)i+1xi⋅f(x1,…,xi^,…,xn+1)     −∑i=1n−1(−1)i+1f(x1,…,xi^,…,xn−1,xi⋅xn,xn+1)     +∑i=1n−1(−1)i+1f(x1,…,xi^,…,xn,xi)⋅xn+1     +∑i=1n−1(−1)i+1f(x1,…,xi^,…,xn−1,xn⋅xi,xn+1)     +∑1≤i<j≤n−1(−1)i+jf([xi,xj]C,x1,…,xi^,…,xj^,…,xn+1)   =dregf(x1,…,xn+1).

Acknowledgements

We thank the referees for valuable suggestions to improve the paper.

Funding

Liangyun Chen is supported by NNSF of China (No. 12271085).

References

  1. [1] V. Ayala, E. Kizil, and I. De Azevedo Tribuzy, On an algorithm for finding derivations of Lie algebras. Proyecciones 31 (2012), no. 1, 81–90 Zbl 1272.17021 MR 2924691
  2. [2] V. Ayala and J. Tirao, Linear control systems on Lie groups and controllability. In G. Ferreyra, R. Gardner, H. Hermes, and H. Sussmann (eds.), Differential geometry and control, pp. 47–64, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 64, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999 Zbl 0916.93015 MR 1654529
  3. [3] C. Bai, Left-symmetric bialgebras and an analogue of the classical Yang–Baxter equation. Commun. Contemp. Math. 10 (2008), no. 2, 221–260 Zbl 1173.17025 MR 2409367
  4. [4] C. Bai, An introduction to pre-Lie algebras. In Algebra and applications 1: non-associative algebras and categories, pp. 245–273, ISTE, London, 2020 Zbl 1496.17023 MR 4484613
  5. [5] I. A. Batalin and G. A. Vilkovisky, Gauge algebra and quantization. Phys. Lett. B 102 (1981), no. 1, 27–31 MR 0616572
  6. [6] A. F. Ber, V. I. Chilin, and F. A. Sukochev, Continuous derivations on algebras of locally measurable operators are inner. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 109 (2014), no. 1, 65–89 Zbl 1304.46064 MR 3237736
  7. [7] A. F. Ber, B. de Pagter, and F. A. Sukochev, Derivations in algebras of operator-valued functions. J. Operator Theory 66 (2011), no. 2, 261–300 Zbl 1247.47011 MR 2844466
  8. [8] D. Burde, Left-symmetric algebras, or pre-Lie algebras in geometry and physics. Cent. Eur. J. Math. 4 (2006), no. 3, 323–357 Zbl 1151.17301 MR 2233854
  9. [9] F. Chapoton and M. Livernet, Pre-Lie algebras and the rooted trees operad. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2001 (2001), no. 8, 395–408 Zbl 1053.17001 MR 1827084
  10. [10] V. Coll, M. Gerstenhaber, and A. Giaquinto, An explicit deformation formula with non-commuting derivations. In Ring theory 1989 (Ramat Gan and Jerusalem, 1988/1989), pp. 396–403, Israel Math. Conf. Proc. 1, Weizmann, Jerusalem, 1989 Zbl 0684.16016 MR 1029329
  11. [11] A. Connes and D. Kreimer, Hopf algebras, renormalization and noncommutative geometry. Comm. Math. Phys. 199 (1998), no. 1, 203–242 Zbl 0932.16038 MR 1660199
  12. [12] A. Das, Leibniz algebras with derivations. J. Homotopy Relat. Struct. 16 (2021), no. 2, 245–274 Zbl 1477.17018 MR 4266206
  13. [13] A. Das and A. Mandal, Extension, deformation and categorification of AssDer pairs. Theory Appl. Categ. 45 (2026), no. 1, 1–32 Zbl 08156150 MR 5018204
  14. [14] V. A. Dolgushev and C. L. Rogers, A version of the Goldman–Millson theorem for filtered L∞‐algebras. J. Algebra 430 (2015), 260–302 Zbl 1327.17019 MR 3323983
  15. [15] V. Dotsenko, S. Shadrin, and B. Vallette, Maurer–Cartan methods in deformation theory: the twisting procedure. London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 488, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2024, 177 pp. Zbl 1526.53001 MR 4621635
  16. [16] M. Doubek and T. Lada, Homotopy derivations. J. Homotopy Relat. Struct. 11 (2016), no. 3, 599–630 Zbl 1360.18015 MR 3542099
  17. [17] A. Dzhumadil’daev, Cohomologies and deformations of right-symmetric algebras. J. Math. Sci. 93 (1999), no. 6, 836–876 Zbl 0938.17002 MR 1698758
  18. [18] Y. Frégier and M. Zambon, Simultaneous deformations and Poisson geometry. Compos. Math. 151 (2015), no. 9, 1763–1790 Zbl 1383.17009 MR 3406444
  19. [19] M. Gerstenhaber, The cohomology structure of an associative ring. Ann. of Math. (2) 78 (1963), no. 2, 267–288 Zbl 0131.27302 MR 0161898
  20. [20] E. Getzler, Lie theory for nilpotent L∞‐algebras. Ann. of Math. (2) 170 (2009), no. 1, 271–301 Zbl 1246.17025 MR 2521116
  21. [21] J. Jiang, Y. Li, and Y. Sheng, Cohomologies of difference Lie groups and the van Est theorem. J. Algebra 645 (2024), 116–142 Zbl 1533.13029 MR 4708529
  22. [22] J. Jiang and Y. Sheng, Representations and cohomologies of relative Rota–Baxter Lie algebras and applications. J. Algebra 602 (2022), 637–670 Zbl 1500.17016 MR 4404533
  23. [23] J. Jiang and Y. Sheng, Deformations, cohomologies and integrations of relative difference Lie algebras. J. Algebra 614 (2023), 535–563 Zbl 1519.17027 MR 4499354
  24. [24] J.-L. Koszul, Domaines bornés homogènes et orbites de groupes de transformations affines. Bull. Soc. Math. France 89 (1961), 515–533 Zbl 0144.34002 MR 0145559
  25. [25] T. Lada and M. Markl, Strongly homotopy Lie algebras. Comm. Algebra 23 (1995), no. 6, 2147–2161 Zbl 0999.17019 MR 1327129
  26. [26] T. Lada and J. Stasheff, Introduction to SH Lie algebras for physicists. Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 32 (1993), no. 7, 1087–1103 Zbl 0824.17024 MR 1235010
  27. [27] A. Lazarev, Y. Sheng, and R. Tang, Deformations and homotopy theory of relative Rota–Baxter Lie algebras. Comm. Math. Phys. 383 (2021), no. 1, 595–631 Zbl 1476.17010 MR 4236074
  28. [28] J. Liu and Q. Wang, Pre-Lie analogues of Poisson–Nijenhuis structures and Maurer–Cartan equations. J. Algebra Appl. 21 (2022), no. 6, article no. 2250120, 34 pp. Zbl 1517.17001 MR 4429005
  29. [29] J.-L. Loday, On the operad of associative algebras with derivation. Georgian Math. J. 17 (2010), no. 2, 347–372 Zbl 1237.18007 MR 2676956
  30. [30] A. R. Magid, Lectures on differential Galois theory. Univ. Lecture Ser. 7, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1994, 105 pp. Zbl 0855.12001 MR 1301076
  31. [31] A. Nijenhuis, Sur une classe de propriétés communes à quelques types différents d’algèbres. Enseign. Math. (2) 14 (1968), 225–277 Zbl 0188.08101 MR 0258898
  32. [32] J. Stasheff, Differential graded Lie algebras, quasi-Hopf algebras and higher homotopy algebras. In P. P. Kulish (ed.), Quantum groups, pp. 120–137, Lecture Notes in Math. 1510, Springer, Berlin, 1992 Zbl 0758.17010 MR 1183483
  33. [33] R. Tang, Y. Frégier, and Y. Sheng, Cohomologies of a Lie algebra with a derivation and applications. J. Algebra 534 (2019), 65–99 Zbl 1455.17020 MR 3979066
  34. [34] È. B. Vinberg, The theory of homogeneous convex cones (in Russian). Tr. Moskov. Mat. Obšč. 12 (1963), 303–358. English translation. Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 12 (1963), 340–403 Zbl 0138.43301 MR 0158414
  35. [35] T. Voronov, Higher derived brackets and homotopy algebras. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 202 (2005), no. 1–3, 133–153 Zbl 1086.17012 MR 2163405
  36. [36] T. T. Voronov, Higher derived brackets for arbitrary derivations. In Travaux mathématiques. Fasc. XVI, pp. 163–186, Trav. Math. 16, Univ. Luxemb., Luxembourg, 2005 Zbl 1136.17014 MR 2223157
  37. [37] Q. Wang and J. Liu, Quasi-pre-Lie bialgebras and twisting of pre-Lie algebras. J. Algebra Appl. 23 (2024), no. 10, article no. 2450160, 33 pp. Zbl 07914997 MR 4783276
  38. [38] Q. Wang, Y. Sheng, C. Bai, and J. Liu, Nijenhuis operators on pre-Lie algebras. Commun. Contemp. Math. 21 (2019), no. 7, article no. 1850050, 37 pp. Zbl 1439.17023 MR 4017776

Cite this article

Shanshan Liu, Liangyun Chen, Cohomologies, deformations and extensions of pre-LieDer pairs. J. Noncommut. Geom. 20 (2026), no. 4, pp. 1169–1196

DOI 10.4171/JNCG/671